All but one of the 19 diocesan bishops resident in Province 4 of The Episcopal Church have signed a letter chastising Joan Dalrymple, president of the Daughters of the King (DOK).
“The apparent inability or unwillingness of the churchwide leadership to produce a full financial accounting and a regular audit of all funds, made freely available to the whole membership, is a matter that concerns us greatly,” said the Rt. Rev. J. Neil Alexander, Bishop of Atlanta, in a letter dated Dec. 6. “We are further concerned to hear that amendments to the constitution and bylaws and other governing documents of the Daughters of the King have been made without the full consent of the membership gathered in the appropriate assembly empowered to make those changes.”
Bishop Alexander concludes the letter with an exhortation for President Dalrymple to “address these concerns, not with us alone, but especially with the leaders of the Daughters at the diocesan and parish levels … as quickly as possible.”
The Rt. Rev. John W. Howe, Bishop of Central Florida and chaplain to the DOK, said he was not present for the Province 4 bishops’ meeting at which the letter was discussed, but he would not have signed even if he had been present both because of his position as chaplain of the order and also because he believes it to be inaccurate.
“As far as I can tell, the finances are transparent,” Bishop Howe said. He added that the results of the 2006 independent audit are published on the DOK website and that the 2007 results will be published there shortly.
“This is a direct reflection of the chaos in the wider church,” Bishop Howe said. “The Daughters were the only Episcopal Church organization experiencing growth.”
At its triennial meeting July 5-9, 2006, in Orlando, Fla., some 80 percent of the 238 delegates agreed to seat with full voice and vote the DOK representatives from the ecumenical chapters, which include Lutheran, Roman Catholic and Anglicans in the U.S. affiliated with overseas provinces. Bishop Howe said he was not invited to become chaplain until the conclusion of the 2006 triennial meeting, but he understood that the parliamentarian had been consulted and ruled before the decision was put to a vote that it was permissible under the DOK bylaws to vote on whether to seat the ecumenical chapters.
“My understanding is that a few former members of the national council are deeply unhappy with that outcome,” Bishop Howe said. “If they are unhappy with the outcome, they are welcome to revisit it at the next triennium.”
Steve Waring
We invite your response to this article through a Letter to the Editor. Email your letter to tlc@livingchurch.org. Please include your name, city and state.
To find more news, feature articles, and commentary about the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion not available online, read The Living Church magazine each week. Click here to start your subscription.


3 Comments
Why didn't Bishop Alexander consult the DOK president (Joan Dalrymple) and
chaplain (Bishop John Howe of Central Florida) before sending this letter to all the
bishops in TEC? In a court of law, innuendo has to be factually supported by those making vague accusations of wrongdoing. In the court of public opinion, unfortunately, damage can be done which after-the-fact clarification and correction may not be able to heal. I pray that in this case, however, the healing can take place. --Celinda Scott
I am an Anglican member of DOK. Somewhere along the line the PB seems to have missed the bylaws of membership. As Anglicans, although not in communion with TEC, we are a part of the Episcopate. Regardless of the politics, we are an Order of women devoted to prayer and service. That is what all must remember. Let's not allow petty women with petty politics demand for our exclusion. Jesus is Lord, and we are ALL here to serve HIM, through prayer and service to our churches and community. May God have mercy on us all, and keep us focused on why we have taken the vow to be Daughters of the King. Taylor Watson Anglican Church of the Redeemer, Chattanooga
I wonder if the same concerns over financial non-transparency regarding the source of the funding of TEC's seemingly reflexive and extensive reliance on civil litigation as a method of conflict resolution would be as forcefully and publicly expressed by the leaders of province IV. That request, by a number of concerned bishops, seems to have been treated as smoke in the wind with no apparent concern expressed by general leadership. I also find it remarkable that Bp. Howe was not consulted by his colleagues before the letter was released. He could probably have pointed them to the existing audit report he has cited in his reply before innuendos of misconduct against the leadership of DOK were sent slithering through the public consciousness. Sounds as though the PB's version of Christian leadership is catching on. Hail to the chief.