Four diocesan bishops met with Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori Feb. 21 to outline an “Anglican Bishops in Communion” plan that was developed in consultation with Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams.
The plan builds upon the “Episcopal Visitor” concept announced last fall by Bishop Jefferts Schori, according to the Rt. Rev. John W. Howe, Bishop of Central Florida, who was one of the group that met with the Presiding Bishop. The existence of the plan was reported Feb. 22 by the British Telegraph newspaper. Bishop Howe subsequently released a summary of the plan and a partial correction of the Telegraph article. The actual plan has not been released.
“Our purpose in meeting with Bishop Jefferts Schori yesterday was to apprize her of this plan, seek her counsel, and assure her that we remain committed to working within the constitution and canons of The Episcopal Church, and that the primates involved in this discussion are not involved in ‘border crossing,’ nor would we be,” Bishop Howe wrote. “We will visit no congregation without the diocesan bishop’s invitation and permission.”
Discussion of the plan will be included on the agenda for the spring House of Bishops’ meeting, according to Neva Rae Fox, public affairs officer for Episcopal Life Media. She did not say whether Bishop Jefferts Schori had given her endorsement.
According to the summary released by Bishop Howe, the “Anglican Bishops in Communion” plan envisions a way for dioceses and congregations to “be assured” of their connection to the Anglican Communion. The communion partners will be informally gathered and the group does not anticipate a formal charter or structure, Bishop Howe said. Participants are committed to transparency, which includes respect for “canonical realities, integrities and structures,” as well as communication of activities with both the Presiding Bishop and the Archbishop of Canterbury, Bishop Howe wrote.
“The bishops who have been designated Episcopal Visitors, together with others who might well consider being included in this number, share many concerns about the Anglican Communion and its future, and we look to work together with primates and bishops from the Global South,” he added. “The bishops will work together according to the principles outlined in the Windsor Report and seek a comprehensive Anglican Covenant at the Lambeth Conference and beyond.”
We invite your response to this article through a Letter to the Editor. Email your letter to tlc@livingchurch.org. Please include your name, city and state.
To find more news, feature articles, and commentary about the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion not available online, read The Living Church magazine each week. Click here to start your subscription.
To find more news, feature articles, and commentary about the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion not available online, read The Living Church magazine each week. Click here to start your subscription.


5 Comments
with all respect to Bishops and Clergy and the Liberal members, the conservatives will not accept a compromise, we dont have to, its our faith and we dont have to change it to meet your sexual needs. Being gay is not a sin, living the lifestyle of sex outside of marriage is a sin. God said man and women go and be fruitful, two of the same sex cannot be fruitful. Marriage is for a man and women. Jesus is the only way to salvation. Bless those that support this idea, and curse those that turn from the word.
Mr. Martin,
While I applaude you on your words above, I must ask. If being gay is not a sin, but having a sexual relationship outside of marriage is, yet marriage is only between a man and a woman, what do you suggest gay men and women do? I can not follow your argument to a sucessful conclusion. God also said that interracial marriages are wrong (it's in the same law section as that one), and that a woman raped in the country is innocent but a woman raped in the city should be stoned because she could have cried for help. Those are in the same Bible. Are you saying we should follow these laws too, since it's "God's Word?" Just currious.
yes
Bill Martin,
What you have said is grievously sinful and I implore you to repent and find the love of Jesus Christ and be saved. There is no love in what you have said. ..Thankfully, you are wrong and the God of love is out there waiting with open arms to embrace you and change you. Religion and God's law appear to you to be a textual game of finding what fits all the discrepancies and variances in the bible and applying the solution... Lo and behold, by doing that you come to the place...of idolatry, the place where what you find printed on a page overrides the love God has placed in your heart.
- This post was edited by The Living Church News Service
Mr. Adkins,
Forgive me for coming to this late. You are confusing interracial marriage with interfaith marriage. In most cases they were synonymous in OT, but the concern clearly is with avoiding the introduction of paganism in Israel. Converts to Israelite religion (like Ruth) were candidates for marriage.
Also, your summation that "a woman raped in the country is innocent but a woman raped in the city should be stoned because she could have cried for help" does not do justice to the actual text in Deut 22. I defer to Gerhard Von Rad's commentary on Deut., as well as P.C. Craigie's.
Thanks.