The Court For the Trial of a Bishop has found the Rt. Rev. Charles E. Bennison, Jr., Bishop of Pennsylvania, guilty on both counts relating to the way he responded after learning that his brother, John, hired by Bishop Bennison as youth group leaders and Sunday School superintendent, was engaged in a sexual relationship with a teenaged youth group member at the parish where Bishop Bennison was rector in the 1970s.
The verdict on the first count, “contemporaneous failure to respond appropriately,” was unanimous. On the second count, “subsequent suppression of pertinent information,” the verdict just met the canonically required two-thirds majority. Bishop Bruce Caldwell of Wyoming joined with the Rev. Marjorie Menaul and the Rev. Karen B. Montagno in dissenting from the majority decision on the second count. There were no opinions issued with the verdicts.
Punishment can be admonition, suspension or deposition as covered under Title IV, Canon 12, Section 1(a).
Lawyers for both Bishop Bennison and The Episcopal Church have until July 30 to file statements or comments “in excuse or mitigation” of the sentence to be imposed. Each side then has until Aug. 15 to comment on any submission made by the other side. Either side may also request a hearing on the sentencing. Lawyers for Bishop Bennison said they would request both a sentencing hearing and an appeal of the decision.
“We are very disappointed that the court found that Bishop Bennison had engaged in conduct unbecoming a member of the clergy,” James Parabue, Bishop Bennison's lawyer said. “The appropriateness of his actions is reflected by the actions of numerous Episcopal bishops, priests, officials and lay members who knew of Bishop Bennison's conduct as early as 1979 and who for 28 years never felt that his conduct was improper and warranted charges being brought against him during that time.”
Imposition of the sentence will be delayed until after the Court of Review of the Trial of a Bishop hears the case. Their decision cannot be appealed. Two members of the Court of Review for the Trial of a Bishop converted to Roman Catholicism before their terms on the court expired. Bishop S. Todd Ousley of Eastern Michigan replaced Bishop Daniel Herzog of Albany and Bishop Mary Gray Reeves of El Camino Real replaced Bishop John B. Lipscomb of Southwest Florida.
Correction: This story as originally posted June 26 contained an error in fact regarding the role of the diocesan standing committee. While a bishop cannot be inhibited, in cases not involving abandonment, without the approval of the diocese’s standing committee, a standing committee has no say in a bishop’s sentencing. TLC News Service regrets the error.
We invite your response to this article through a Letter to the Editor. Email your letter to tlc@livingchurch.org. Please include your name, city and state.
To find more news, feature articles, and commentary about the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion not available online, read The Living Church magazine each week. Click here to start your subscription.
Read additional coverage of the presentment trial
Bishop’s Attorney: Trial Not About Brother’s Conduct


1 Comment
It strikes me that this trial should have been held no later than 1980. I cannot see what good can come of this. I wonder how many of us 'aging boomers' could withstand a close scrutiny by criminal, civil or ecclesiastical court of sins of omission and commission committed 30 or 40 years ago. Many of us were pretty young and stupid then. I thought we were admonished to forgive not seven times, but seventy times seven. Mike Foughty