Following is Bishop Ackerman's Oct. 19 statement to the press:
I greet you in the precious Name of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, whose servant I am.
When I retired one year ago as the Bishop, Diocese of Quincy, the Episcopal Church, I did so for reasons of physical, spiritual and emotional distress, related to the ongoing demise of the Episcopal Church. When promised assistance with my health insurance was denied by the Episcopal Church Center in freezing invested funds in Quincy, my health insurance was cancelled. It, therefore, became necessary for me to seek part time employment that would provide the money necessary to have health insurance.
I accepted a position counseling the homeless, and the unemployed, in a Christian non-profit organization in Dallas, Texas. It became necessary for me to learn Spanish since 95% of the people with whom I am counseling speak only Spanish.
I did so and this experience made it possible for me to respond positively to the kind invitation of the Bishop of Bolivia to minister part time, in addition to assisting part time in the Diocese of Springfield (Ill.). Both dioceses are duly recognized members of the Anglican Communion. I saw no conflict of interest with the Episcopal Church, but wrote the Presiding Bishop for clarification in July 2009 and believed that there would be no problem with this extension of ministry.
This letter was handwritten, sharing with the Presiding Bishop my current health, my new ministry with the homeless, my desire to assist another Anglican partner in ministry in Bolivia and, at their invitation, to participate informally (seat but no voice and no vote) in the House of Bishops of the Southern Cone. At no time did I express dissatisfaction with the Episcopal Church, or make any statement of a desire to be separated from it.
I made no copies of my letter because I wanted it to be clear that this was a very personal communication. She responded by written letter, telling me that she would send the appropriate documentation. After two months with no communication, I sent another handwritten, unduplicated letter asking about this matter.
This past Friday, October 16, 2009, I received an e-mail from the Presiding Bishop, “indicating that there is no provision for transferring a bishop to another Province.” At no time did I request transfer to the Southern Cone. Her letter concluded, “I am therefore releasing you from the obligations of ordained ministry in the Episcopal Church.” (Clarification: I asked to be transferred to the Diocese of Bolivia.)
I did not ask for release and have never considered ministry in this Church an obligation, since it has been the source of my greatest joy.
I have not renounced, and in fact, in my first handwritten letter indicated that my intention was not to be seen as either “abandonment of the Communion” or “Renunciation.”
I have never received telephone calls from either the Presiding Bishop or any member of her staff asking for clarification. I can only conclude that assumptions were made, in the press of events, which are incorrect. I intend to continue my ministry wherever and whenever possible.
Yours in Christ,
The Rt. Rev. Keith L. Ackerman, Bishop of Quincy, retired
Get the next 52 weeks of The Living Church Online, plus convenient access to more than a year of archived issues, all for just $25!Click here to start your subscription to the TLC Online Edition today!


4 Comments
I appreciate the fact that Bishop Ackerman would like to continue to minister to Episcoalians, but he can't have it both ways. He is either an Episcopalian, or a member of the Diocese of Bolivia.
We as an organized church have reached a all time low in people matter issues. If as has been laid out in public domain the bishop was writing to advise the PB of what he was going to be doing and who he was doing it with, then the action taken by PB is truly unchristian and probably illegal. As time goes by each month I am amazed at the many of the actions of the PB. It has always been my understanding that a preist or Bishop with the approval of the recieving Bishop who was part of the Anglican communion would in no way jeopardize the standing in the Episcopal Church.
My read is the PB is angry over the fact that Quincy withdrew from TEC and joined ACNA. If as I suspect the case to be and as I remember it Bishop Ackerman retired before the vote was take to withdraw. So it appears the PB is individually and without consult of the Bishops of TEC and others, throwing The Bishop out of even the priesthood. What a sad commentary on the state of the Church. It like kids playing if one gets mad he picks up the marbles and goes home. The PB is acting like a kid.
I commented to Episcopal Life last evening. Not only do my comments not appear, the entire story has apparently been wiped from the web site.
Dissent is not well tolerated.
One must stand for truth or eventually loose their legs. God is not mocked. Those who compromise by remaining silent and "not taking sides" in order to retain some supposed "higher ground" end up serving no purpose to either side, including the side that happens to be in accord with God's will. The Abraham saga still has much to teach even those who are called "Father" of and in the faith. Choose, this day, and God will ewnew all, if the heart is right. Otherwise, as the prophet has said "neither hot nor cold" will be spit out.