In a 2,800-word reflection on The Episcopal Church's relationship to the broader Anglican Communion, the Archbishop of Canterbury on Monday again emphasized that the Communion may follow a two-track model in its future structure.
Archbishop Rowan Williams twice described the blessing of same-sex couples as involving a chosen lifestyle, and mentioned blessings’ possible ill effects on ecumenical relations, or decreased involvement in such dialogues.
In the archbishop’s description, one Communion track favors the proposed Anglican Covenant as a way of uniting Anglicans, while a second track may decide that local autonomy must prevail.
“If those who elect this model do not take official roles in the ecumenical interchanges and processes in which the ‘covenanted’ body participates, this is simply because within these processes there has to be clarity about who has the authority to speak for whom,” the archbishop wrote.
For those Anglicans who do not favor a covenant, “there is no threat of being cast into outer darkness—existing relationships will not be destroyed that easily,” he wrote. “But it means that there is at least the possibility of a twofold ecclesial reality in view in the middle distance: that is, a ‘covenanted’ Anglican global body, fully sharing certain aspects of a vision of how the church should be and behave, able to take part as a body in ecumenical and interfaith dialogue; and, related to this body, but in less formal ways with fewer formal expectations, there may be associated local churches in various kinds of mutual partnership and solidarity with one another and with ‘covenanted’ provinces.”
Archbishop Williams renewed his often-expressed hope that all provinces of the Anglican Communion ultimately will support the covenant, which faces a new round of possible revision.
“But in the current context, the question is becoming more sharply defined of whether, if a province declines such an invitation, any elements within it will be free (granted the explicit provision that the Covenant does not purport to alter the Constitution or internal polity of any province) to adopt the Covenant as a sign of their wish to act in a certain level of mutuality with other parts of the Communion. It is important that there should be a clear answer to this question.”
A one-year subscription to The LivingChurch Online also gives you convenient access to more than a year of archived issues, all for just $25! Click here to start your subscription to the TLC Online Edition today!


2 Comments
I have read a number of blogs on this piece of news and my reading of others comments is that many conservative Anglicans still view the ABS as being irresponsible and inactive in the midst of a crisis caused by TEC.
However I read the ABC statement to mean that finally TEC has crossed the line and chosen to walk apart. The consequences are that they will be shifted onto a different tract. They will be in the Anglican family, and free to maintain relationships on a one to one basis, as best they can, but not represented in the councils of the wider communion.
He holds out hope for diocese within TEC that they might still be fully Anglican, with representation, if they can sign on to the covenant, even in its unfinished form. I expect that these diocese will be offered a procedure for securing their full Anglican identity and that this procedure will also be offered to ACNA
www.churchoftheowrd.net
I wonder what the Archbishop will do when/if his own Church of England declines to accept the Covenant???